Tuesday, June 03, 2008

The True Cost Of NYC Pensions

It is only the third day of June and the month could not keep New York clean of financial irregularities. We've had slush funds, Bear Mountain Compacts and Spitzer-mania already this year to name a few. Now we've got a low-balling actuary who has given favorable estimates to the unions at the expense of the city budget, to the tune of $500 million dollars.

From The NY Times:

ALBANY — An actuary paid by public employee unions and yet relied upon by the State Legislature to determine the cost of proposals affecting New York City’s pension system underestimated their ultimate cost by at least $500 million, city documents and other records show.

In the hundreds of bills for which he has provided estimates to lawmakers since 2000, the actuary, Jonathan Schwartz, said legislation adjusting the pensions of public employees would have no cost, or limited cost, to the city.

But just 11 of the more than 50 bills vetted by Mr. Schwartz that have become law since 2000 will result in the $500 million in eventual costs, or more than $60 million annually, according to projections provided by Robert C. North Jr., the independent actuary of the city pension system, and by Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg’s office.

Mr. North and other city employees made the calculations on the 11 bills when they were before the Legislature, but for the other bills, no alternative to Mr. Schwartz’s projections could be found. The New York Times reported last month that in an arrangement that had not been publicly disclosed, Mr. Schwartz was being paid by labor unions. He acknowledged in an interview that he skewed his work to favor the public employees, calling his job “a step above voodoo.”


"A step above voodoo," thats classic. Well not really, it is more like the status quo in New York, no matter what level it is at. Seriously, will this type of crap ever end?